After launching the teaser, makers of Krrish 3 have finally released the full video of its song Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram.If you are thinking it to be a traditional song then you are in for a surprise. Music director Rajesh Roshan has given a twist to it and has made it a party number with Hrithik Roshan and Priyanka Chopra grooving to its tune.Sung by Neeraj Shridhara and Monali Thakur, the song's lyrics have been penned by Sameer Anjan.Starring Hrithik Roshan, Priyanka Chopra, Vivek Oberoi and Kangana Ranaut, Krrish 3 will take off from where Krrish left off.Directed by Rakesh Roshan, the film will release on November 4.Check out the song.
Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram Krrish 3 Video Song Free Download
Agree that dance is good but song is average. Use of Raghupati Raghav in this song is as cheesy/bad as Rani Mukerji singing Om Jai Jagdish Hare in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai.———–@Baba,May be the Black guy saying Raghupati Raghav here is supposed to make Indians happy/proud because someone from another country said it. Use of Black guys/girls in Haseena Gori Gori or that Rishi Kapoor song is at least ok as there is some African beats/rhythms in those songs. Incidentally Rajesh Roshan is the composer of those songs too and Haseena Gori Gori is inspired/copied from Mungo Jerry’s In the Summertime.————@Anjanpur685Miles,I still don’t like the excessive Brake Dancing type of moves but agree with you that Hrithik’s dance is more manly.
May be it has something to do with him looking more muscular or heavily built too.———–@suprabh,“The best and most effective use of a black guy was in another Priyanka movie- Fashion”Yeah Madhur The Great Bandarkar showed the depths to which Priyanka had fallen or how low she had stooped by sleeping with a Black Man. Madhur could have shown some Indian guy who was not there earlier in the movie and who was a complete stranger to her too. But the fact is that he chose a Black guy instead of a White guy or Asian guy.And here is the scene. She wakes up and is shocked/surprised to see herself in some room with her clothes lying around. But look at the reaction when she sees the Black guy sleeping next to her at 0:42. But then the camera focuses on the back of the Black guy twice at 0:47 and 0:56.
Look at the disgust on her face at 0:47. Agree with sputnik on Fashion thingactuallly i read a couple of thing about the scene.
And movie.she is shocked because the guy is unknown nd all. But her shock is more to do with guy being black too because in the next scene, she washes her face so strongly, to confirm that no black color is on her body. She is shocked to sleep with an unknown guy but black one.The scene fulfills both the things. That’s y madhur showed priyanka washing her face with so force to remove the black color if lil on her face. And also he used technical things what sputnik said already. May be saurabh did not articulate it well. This is Madhur we are talking about.
Watch this scene. She wipes her face with a tissue so forcefully because she is wiping drugs and other stuff? She is crying so hard – because she slept with a random stranger? No its because Madhur is catering to the racist crowd who thinks its abominable for Priyanka to sleep with a Black guy.There are a lot of older movies where the heroine either gets raped or becomes a prostitute and she is disgusted with herself and is shown in the next scene in the shower trying to wash off the dirt/sin respectively.
Even Requiem for a Dream has a scene where Jennifer Connelly becomes a prostitute and sleeps with a Black guy and in the next scene she is shown crying in the bath. This is a Madhur Bhandarkar movie not some realistic documentary on modelling. You are saying she is a model so she won’t be hung up on sleeping with a Black guy but then why would she be so upset about a one night stand? She slept with her married boss, had an abortion but that’s not the last straw – its sleeping with a Black guy.Anyways I am sure that Madhur used a Black guy in that scene so that it shocks the stupid racist audience who thinks its abominable for Priyanka to sleep with a Black guy.Read all these reviews/comments which talk about the same thing.“Ouch. Why is Bollywood so racist? Anyone remember how in Fashion, a high-on-drugs-and-fame Priyanka Chopra realised how low she had fallen only when she found herself in bed with a BLACK man.”Raja Sen“Aiming at showing Priyanka Chopra’s fall from grace, the film takes her from having an affair with a married man, to taking to drink, to taking to soft drugs, then harder drugs.
What then could possibly further her complete descent into hell? Well, the film shows her sleeping with a black man — and then scrubbing herself off because of how unclean she feels.”Rangan“How do we know Meghna has turned badder? Because she’s begun to smoke. And how do we know that she’s at her baddest, at the scum-pit of supermodeldom? Because she takes drugs and – you’d better be sitting down for this – sleeps with a black man.”“and racism – oh the horror of a pretty pretty image-centered girl hitting on and sleeping with a black man! How loud and clear the wake-up call she needs to snap out of her decline and fall! ”“Bhandarkar also takes on the subject of race and, as is his wont, swims against the tide.
In these Obama-times, Priyanka’s character is an unabashed racist. She realises that she has reached her nadir only after waking up from an alcohol-induced one-night stand with a Black man.”“In Bollywood, the racism is a bit more subtle. In the movie Fashion, Priyanka Chopra’s character is a high fashion model who is spiraling out of control.
The climax of her drug induced,wild behavior is sleeping with an African man. The next scene was her waking up to quickly realize she needed help.”“Add to that the blatant racism of the scene where she realizes she hit rock bottom after sleeping with a black guy. Because the fact your boss essentially gave you the boot, your friends more or less all deserted you, your alcoholism, and then taking drugs, that’s not enough to make you realize you may have deeply messed up your life. No, it’s a one night stand with a black guy. Oh the horror! (Not to mention the implication that she wouldn’t have had sex with him if it hadn’t been for the drugs. Gah, just typing this makes me angry.)”“And how does Bhandarkar establish that at one point Chopra has really fallen from grace to the depths of depravity?
She starts doing drugs and drinking alcohol heavily. It is fine up to this point in so much as he maligns those habits. Then he introduces a random black character with whom Chopra sleeps in the haze of her drugs and alcohol. When she wakes up the next morning she discovers the black man asleep next to her. She looks utterly horrified.There is no subtlety to the Chopra character’s horror. It is obvious that she is horrified not because she slept with just any man in a drunken stupor but a black man. Could an Indian woman fall lower than that seems to be the crude suggestion that Bhandarkar leaves you with.
It is entirely possible that Bhandarkar was not even aware of the implications of his storytelling technique. But then how could that be considering he takes the trouble to bring in a black character? It is not as if such characters are so common in Mumabi’s fashion world.”. This is not over reading. Its pretty obvious from the scene. And its not one or two people who are over reading it for agenda.
When you say Anurag/Imtiaz have a small town mentality then is that overreading?Madhur has the small town mentality. He will have Priyanka sleeping with the Black guy as the worst thing that she can do after being sleeping with her boss, having an abortion, getting drunk and doing drugs. He will show Kangna and everyone react like prudes to the wardrobe malfunction scene when in reality the reactions are nothing like that. She washes herself strongly as she feels that she has become filthy and cheap. Its more like trying to remove the dirt within her than removing black skin color. Its a sign of guilt and low self esteem, that somehow washing yourself can make oneself feel better. And also in the scene to tries to remove the black stuff again and again (dark color may be due to drug usage).
Its an analogy that she is unable to get rid of the consequences of her actions. And that totally breaks her.Even Sridevi washes her face after her French friend proposes to her in English Vinglish. There is also the scene with Manisha taking a bath in Dil Se, as she tries to ignore her feelings and sets her mind into her other goals. And there is Anuskha washing clothes in RNBDJ because she feels guilty about her thoughts about Raj. Its a similar analogy wrt to women, i.e to deny feelings or get over some strong emotion I really don’t know why black man was used in the scene. Thats something only Madhur Bhandarkhar can say.
@sputnik,I never read any Fashion movie review, nor did I notice it as a racism issue – the connection that the guy she slept with is Black, and that is why she feels disgusted at herself. IMO, African man refers to not just a stranger but also a foreigner, whom Chopra’s character is shown not to recognize after waking up, and hence, she is shocked. I never knew a cliche like ‘sleeping with black guy is bad’ existed, in India.So many negative reviews on Fashion? Seems reviewers hate any director once they notice a pattern in their movies. Saw the scene again.I still think she was very casual about the guy being blackIn the initial scene she looks at that guy and is not super shocked or anything.This is precisely the main reason why I felt she wasn’t too concerned about the guy being black.You guys are making too much out of the back shot. Here’s one more thing.Sometimes the viewer’s own sensibilities plays a big role in interpreting a scene. If those reviewers took that scene as a BLACK GUY thing.then may be they do consider it abominable for a girl to sleep with a black guy.
You will stick to the same point despite evidence to the contrary – the two scenes posted and so many reviewers and ordinary people commenting the same.If the scene showed her waking up next to a random guy and just walking out I would have given the benefit of doubt. But the camera focusing on the Black skin and her shocked reactions leave no doubt whatsoever.You are saying she is a model so she will have no problems sleeping with a Black guy then why is she so disturbed after that scene? This is being casual?
Krrish 3
You mean to say a small town girl from Chandigarh will have no problem having an abortion without being married but is so disturbed because she had a one night stand? You are going to use the argument that models are cool about Black guys but not the point that models might be cool about one night stands too?And you are acting as if Madhur shows reality. This is the Kangana Wardrobe malfunction scene from Fashion. Look at how he shows the scene. Everyone is so shocked and disgusted – their morality is offended. Now this was based on the Carol Gracias wardrobe malfunction incident and I am pretty sure the audience and models did not react that way.And this is absolutely wonderful. Yes the people who said the scene is racist are racist.
May be I should just turn around this and say that the people who are condoning this scene are racist. She has slept previously with at least one person. It was not new to her; with stranger maybe. But then the stranger could be anyone. If the movie was made anywhere else, I would have given benefit of doubt but not in India when likelihood of finding a black guy at a party is as good as finding a white guy in addition to our general bias based on color.As I said they could have shown some dirty looking guy or white guy if the intention was that she was not in control that she slept with stranger. Sputnik,Why are you getting aggravated? (Maybe you are not, it just seems like it though).I told you repeatedly, I am fine with you thinking that that scene was racist.and I said sometimes when people react the way to a situation it could be a result of their own sensibilities (This doesn’t mean that they are racists.It could also imply cliches.)you said, I am going against the evidence and that I am sticking to a theory.
What you are not understanding is that there is no evidence per se. Its your or mine inference of that scene. You can prove anyone wrong on facts but you cant prove anyone wrong on their opinion or interpretation.And its not as if I am debating to prove a point here.I am just stating what I think about a scene.
And as it turns out I am not the only one who thinks like that.Others like Baba and Rajesh also have felt the same way as I did. Yes I am the one who is aggravated when you are suggesting that the people who say a scene is racist are the ones who are racist. I will remember to point out the next time all those people who object to a movie/song/scene saying it is racist/sexist/regressive that they are the ones who are racist/sexist/regressive for objecting.This is not my interpretation or inference. I am not assuming/interpreting that the guy was Black even though he was not shown.
So Madhur must have said I need a actor to do this scene with Priyanka and the casting agent randomly found a Black guy in Mumbai to cast in this role? I can’t believe people can be so naive that they think Madhur just happened to cast a Black guy for this scene instead of some random Indian guy. I don’t think there was any Black guy in the whole movie apart from this scene if I am not wrong.I am pretty sure that majority of the Black people will find this scene racist/offensive and I am surprised that someone who lives in US thinks this scene is not racist. Totally agree with Sputnik here. Madhur chose a black guy for the scene to enhance the impact of showing Priyanka sleeping with a random guy she sees at a nightclub. Showing an Indian/white guy would have had a lesser impact after what all Priyanka’s character has gone through in the movie.
Having a black guy makes what she did even worse in the eyes of the audience. Of course, this speaks to the utterly racist mindset of the audience, which Madhur understood perfectly and shrewdly exploited. It is a terrible move on his part, since it enforces the racist cliche in the audience’s mind, but also a successful move from the point of view of the story’s graph.Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I feel when people are saying there is nothing more to the fact that the guy is black and he just happens to be black, people are either in denial or being very naive. Dont mean to offend anyone, just my thoughts. Cant argue more.
When sputnik argued so muchbtw just think, if u r a director, making a picture. You want to show your actress is going very low nd all now if you are a director, and u are not considering any racism. So to show priyanka sleeping with a stranger, will you hire a normal indian guy or even an indian black guy or a african black guy. IMO you will prefer a african black guy in that scene, when you are considering racism.or.
when you want to touch the audience emotion more deeply, (where audience will be emotionally more touched when they see a lady sleeping with black guy or when audience is (subconsciously) racist ).i guess this should work with the guys who are not understanding y only black guy used in that scenei hope u’ll understand.agree with sputnik on my articulation thing “this time also i hope u understand.” dusro ka kuch kh ni skte comment padne wale k interpretation pe bhi depend krta h. Yeah the main purpose of showing ‘African American’ (lets be diplomatic) is primarily to be explicit abt having sex with a stranger – which later forces the gal to breakdown on moral grounds after being exploited so long by that Arbaaz character (as far as i can remember this movie).But since it is Madhur, i think he also added a sexual innuendo here.Maybe for the racially inclined part of the audience – sleeping with ‘African American’ is a bigger disgrace than say sleeping with a random white guy.